好喜欢无冬2里The Trial的剧本编写，于是找出编辑器，仔细的看了代码，愈发佩服制作人员精雕细琢的精神。在这里，可以清楚看到细心完成支线任务的奖励，以及各种对话skill的优势。并且，即使没有完成任何支线，不使用skill，也还是有机会打赢的，但是在对话上的选择要非常谨慎。不该说的不要说，不该问的不要问，非常贴近真实的法庭辩论！（无冬1里也有类似的一幕，不过没有这个复杂）

The Trial

说明：以下仅列出会影响判决（Verdict）、阵营、和队友影响力（Inf）的对话。Verdict是最后判决的标准，如果大于5则为无罪。所谓影响这些参数的对话，是指的起决定性作用的一句，不会引之后的分支对话的选择不同而改变。阵营变化一律用加值表示；N/A表示这句话没有任何参数影响。

—— PART 1 ——-
[Torio]: I speak for those the accused slaughtered at Ember – and I am here to see that justice is carried out this day.

1. As are we all, Ambassador. (N/A)
2. I think the ambassador speaks out of turn. No guilty verdict has been issued. (Verdict +1)
3. You don’t speak for the dead of Ember, Ambassador, you are the one responsible. (Verdict +1)
4. I think this Luskan hound has spoken out of turn – she’d best be silent, or I will silence her. (Verdict -1)

[Sand]: It may take a while for them to get through all the evidence, bless it, and the rest of the ritual nonsense, so if you have anything you want to ask, now’s the best time.

1. I still don’t understand how I was ill-fated enough to have you represent me. (Inf to Sand -1)
2. Do you have any advice? (N/A)

[Sand]: It is somewhat… unorthodox, but playing upon the animosity between Luskan and Neverwinter may help you…

1. I want to win by the rules of the court, not because of Luskan prejudice. (Lawful +1)
2. But? You don’t sound convinced. (N/A)
3. Unorthodox suits me fine – and Luskan’s been quick to use it when they can, anyway. (Chaos +1)

[Sand]: And do not threaten her or try to bluff her unless you are equally certain – if you fail, you are bound for the gallows for certain.

1. Your advice is useless, forget I asked. (Inf to Sand-1)
2. I’ll heed your advice. (N/A)
2.1 And Sand – thanks for representing me. (Inf to Sand +1)
2.2 If you let me down now, Sand, remember it’s not just my life that’s at risk. If I go to the gallows, I’ll say you were at Ember with me. Got it? (Evil +1)

—– PART 2 —–
[Oleff]: …and that is the evidence before us.
<----- Clue Score 线索评分 ------>
1. (Low, 0-2) Negative murmuring from audience. 群众嘘声。{注：Sand会说：Well, that didn’t go over well.} (Verdict -1)
2. (Medium, 3-4) Low-level, neutral murmuring from audience, neither good or bad. 毁誉参半。{注：Sand会说：Well, that didn’t seem to help much…}(N/A)
3. (Good, 5-6) Positive murmuring from audience. 得到群众认同。{注：Sand会说：Ah, that went over well…} (Verdict +1)
4. (Perfect, 7)Excited, positive murmuring from audience. 群情激愤。{注：Sand会说：Perfect. Look at their faces… 我玩的就是这个结果:) } (Verdict +3)




[Torio]: 根据线索评分会有不同的发言，只有后两种情况下会出现前4种回答：

1. [Diplomacy] Forgive me, Ambassador, but are you speculating on the truth of the evidence? (无判定)

2. [Intimidate] Why do you want to distract us from the evidence? Scared of what it means, Luskan? (Intimidate skill判定：不小于8为成功, Verdict +1; 小于8为失败, Verdict -1, Inf to Sand -1)

3. (如果主角是牧师)To question the evidence presented within this court and before the god Tyr, offends me as a priest, Reverend Judge. Accuse me if you must, but I would ask the ambassador not to insult the gods. (Verdict +1) {注：当牧师的白赚啊}

4. Are you saying this evidence is questionable? (Verdict -1)

{以下为一定会出现的回答}
5. Let her bring her witnesses in – I look forward to it. (进入下一阶段)
6. You handle her from here, Sand. I don’t want to cross-examine the witnesses. (结案)
7. I won’t put myself on trial to any dog of Luskan. I say settle the verdict now! (Verdict -1, 结案)

—— PART 3 证人VENTON ORLEY，只有Thief分支才会出现——

[Sand]: Do you know this man? I do not know whether he is a Luskan deception, or one from your friend, Goodman Devrie.

1. I say we let him speak, we need a friendly witness on our side, true or not. (Chaos +1)
2. Denounce him now. I don’t know him, and it’s not right that he testify for us. (Lawful +1)
3. What do you think we should do, Sand? (Inf to Sand +1)
4. I’ve never met him before. But he seems to speak the language of the court, judging from the audience reaction. (N/A)
5. Stop asking me questions in the middle of the trial, you’ll ruin his cover! (Inf to Sand -1)

[Torio]: Is this one of your witnesses, Sand? You seem… confused.

1. He’s not a true witness, I cannot allow him to speak. (Lawful +1)
2. I have no idea who this man is, but he can tell tales elsewhere, not in this courtroom. (Verdict +2)
3. He may be confused… but I’d like to hear what he has to say. (N/A, Verdict +2)
4. [Lie] I know this man, and I want him to speak. (Chaos +1, Verdict +2)

—— PART 4 证人ELGUN，如果之前没有戳穿他的谎言才会出现 ——

[Torio]: Welcome, Elgun. You were brave to make the journey here, especially considering the danger in testifying.

1. Danger? What danger? (N/A)
2. If you are implying he would be at risk from me, I ask you take it back. (N/A)
3. [Taunt] Now now, Ambassador, I’m certain you wouldn’t strike Elgun while he was testifying, so I doubt he’s in any danger here. (Taunt skill判定，不小于15为成功, Verdict +1, 反之-1)
4. If he is a witness, then his testimony can only help me. (N/A)

[Torio]: Oh, yes. Those poor helpless farmers, cut down by that one there… (无论怎么回答，Verdict -2)

[Elgun]: What did you want to know? I’ve given my testimony.

1. [Diplomacy] Elgun, no one doubts you are a brave man, but… (Displomacy skill 判定，不小于8为成功, Verdict +1, 反之-1)

2. [Intimidate] I think you’re a fool that’s told one too many stories, and I suggest you start telling the truth – now. (Intimidate skill判定，不小于6为成功，继续2.1；否则 Verdict -1)

3. [Bluff] Do you know what the penalty for lying before the god Tyr is, Elgun? (Bluff skill判定，不小于10为成功，Verdict +2；否则 Verdict -1)

4. You said there was more than one attacker. How many? (N/A)

5. [Spot] You fought them? Where are the scars? (无判定, Verdict +1)

6. What were you doing in the area? (Verdict -1)

7. Did you see the leader?

8. (如果和Haljal谈论过Elgun) How could you fight so many? Your own townspeople say you’re terrible with a blade. (Verdict +1)

9. (如果和Alaine或Marcus交谈过) I spoke with a survivor. I heard there were only about a dozen attackers at Ember, and no demons. (Verdict +1)

10. No more questions, Reverend Judge. (N/A, next part)

(to be continued….)
－－－－－－－－－－－－累p了的分割线－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
乖乖，光控方证人就要到PART 9，待续吧……